MINUTES
General Meeting
Wednesday, 19 February 2025
The Council Chambers
91 - 93 Bloomfield Street
CLEVELAND QLD
MINUTES
General Meeting
Wednesday, 19 February 2025
The Council Chambers
91 - 93 Bloomfield Street
CLEVELAND QLD
General Meeting Minutes 19 February 2025
2 Record of Attendance and Leave of Absence
3.1 Condolence – Michael Challoner
4.1 Disaster Management Team, SES and Community Champions
4.2 Retirement of Mary McDougall
5 Receipt and Confirmation of Minutes
6 Declaration of Prescribed Conflict of Interests and Declarable Conflict of Interests
6.1 Declarable Conflict of Interest – Councillor Lance Hewlett
6.2 Declarable Conflict of Interest – Mayor Jos Mitchell
7 Matters Outstanding from Previous Council Meetings
7.2 Indoor Sports Facilities Planning
10 Petitions and Presentations
11 Motion to Alter the Order of Business
12 Reports from the Office of the CEO
13 Reports from Organisational Services
13.1 January 2025 Monthly Financial Report
14 Reports from Advocacy, ajor Projects and Economic Development
14.1 2025 Federal Election Advocacy
15 Reports from Community & Customer Services.
16 Reports from Infrastructure & Operations
17 Notices of Intention to Repeal or Amend a Resolution
18.1 Councillor Representative Portfolio Structure
19 Urgent Business Without Notice
20.1 Request for Further Deferral of Infrastructure Charges
20.2 Disposal of Land and Road Closure - Mount Cotton
20.3 Public Tracks and Trails on Private Land
20.4 Redland Investment Corporation Financial Report for period ending 30 September 2024
20.5 Chief Executive Recruitment Process
20.6 Strategic Property Opportunity
The Deputy Mayor declared the meeting open at 9.30am and acknowledged the Quandamooka people, who are the traditional custodians of the land on which Council meets.
The Deputy Mayor also paid Council’s respect to their elders, past and present, and extended that respect to other indigenous Australians who were present.
2 Record of Attendance and Leave of Absence
MEMBERS PRESENT: Cr Wendy Boglary (Division 1), Cr Peter Mitchell (Division 2), Cr Paul Gollè (Division 3), Cr Lance Hewlett (Division 4), Cr Shane Rendalls (Division 5), Cr Julie Talty (Division 6), Cr Rowanne McKenzie (Division 7), Cr Tracey Huges (Division 8), Cr Jason Colley (Division 9), Cr Paul Bishop (Division 10)
VIRTUAL ATTENDANCE: Cr Jos Mitchell (Mayor)
EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP TEAM: Louise Rusan (Acting Chief Executive Officer), Grant Mather (Acting General Manager Organisational Services), David Jeanes (Acting General Manager Community & Customer Services), Margit Connellan (Acting General Manager Infrastructure & Operations), Natasha Comber (Proxy for General Manager Advocacy, Major Projects & Economic Development), Sandra Bridgeman (Executive Group Manager Financial Services & Chief Financial Officer), Andrew Ross (Executive Group Manager Risk & Legal Services), Micah Beaumont (Acting Executive Group Manager People, Culture & Organisational Performance)
MINUTES: Lizzi
Striplin (Senior Governance Adviser)
Marina Roddy (Governance Adviser)
|
Council Resolution 2025/9 Moved by: Cr Peter Mitchell Seconded by: Cr Paul Gollè That Councillor Jos Mitchell be permitted to participate in the meeting via teleconference. Carried 10/0 Crs Wendy Boglary, Peter Mitchell, Paul Gollè, Lance Hewlett, Shane Rendalls, Julie Talty, Rowanne McKenzie, Tracey Huges, Jason Colley and Paul Bishop voted FOR the motion. Cr Jos Mitchell did not participate in the vote. |
COUNCILLOR ABSENCES DURING THE MEETING
Cr Lance Hewlett left the meeting at 10.19am (during item 14.1) and returned at 10.21am (during item 14.1).
Cr Wendy Boglary left the meeting at 11.52am (during item 18.1) and returned at 11.54am (during item 18.1).
Cr Paul Bishop left the meeting at 11.55am (during item 18.1) and returned at 11.58am (during item 18.1).
Cr Tracey Huges left the meeting at 12.47pm (during item 20.6) and returned at 12.48pm (during item 20.6).
Cr Lance Hewlett left the meeting at 1.57pm (during the vote on item 20.3) and did not return for the closure of the meeting.
Cr Jos Mitchell left the meeting at 1.57pm (during the vote on item 20.3) and did not return for the closure of the meeting.
Pastor Angie Herranz from Chaplaincy Australia, also a member of the Minister’s Fellowship, led Council in a brief Devotional segment.
3.1 Condolence – Michael Challoner
Cr Wendy Boglary expressed condolences for Michael Challoner:
Many of Council’s longer serving staff would remember Michael Challoner and today I would like to remember his contribution to our community.
Michael Challoner served as Redland Shire Council’s first employed town planner, from 4 December 1976 to 1 February 1985, making an invaluable contribution to the development of Redland City.
His expertise and advice were highly regarded and respected by colleagues and community members alike. Michael was often called upon to be an expert witness for the courts.
Michael truly valued his time with Council, cherishing the opportunity to positively impact the city's growth and planning initiatives. When Michael joined Council there were 6 planning schemes over the City and he managed the first single Town Plan at a time when the growth rate was double what it is today. Michael’s foresight in retaining certain parcels of land ensured the liveability we enjoy today, 40 years later, in many of our areas.
His legacy in the field continues to be appreciated by everyone who had the privilege of working with him. Over the past month I have had several ex-Council staff speak very highly of his work ethic, leadership and being a true gentleman.
4.1 Disaster Management Team, SES and Community Champions
Deputy Mayor Julie Talty recognised the Disaster Management Team, SES and Community Champions.
We have just witnessed the terrible devastation that the floods in North Queensland caused to our colleagues, particularly at Ingham in the Hinchinbrook Shire and Townsville, over the last few weeks.
As we know, our Disaster Management Team, SES and Community Champions here at Redlands are very special people, of whom we are all very proud. It gives me immense pride and honour, not only as a Councillor, but also as the Deputy Chair of our Local Disaster Management Committee, to advise you that Redlands sent a contingent of personnel up to Ingham and Townsville to support our northern colleagues.
Councillors, I would like to acknowledge and thank these amazing Redlanders:
Mike Tait - our Service Manager for Disaster Management. Mike spent 10 days in the Disaster Control Centre at Ingham doing what Mike does best.
We had 28 SES volunteers go up to Ingham and Townsville to help out the local community throughout this most difficult time. Thank you very much to:
Amanda Griffith
Chris Evans
Di Vandermeer
Enrica Brazzelli
Hammy Nosa
Heather Curley
Heather Robertson
Jane Cooke
Jonathon Gibbon
Kathleen Brzoskowski
Ken Bridge
Lee Unitt
Lloyd Marken
Luke Forster
Malakai Keen
Melanie Knight
Mike Jones – 2 deployments
Ross Alcorn
Scott Barnes
Sidrah Harcourt
Tim Willis
Tony Morton – 2 deployments
Tori Moore-Enright
Cindel Richardson
Alexandra Davies
Belinda Brown
Cooper McKillop
Jenny Ross
A special thank you to Catrina Malcom and David Fraser who assisted with the logistics back here at Redlands.
We also had three of our amazing community champions deployed to Townsville and Ingham working in their Evacuation Centres and recovery hubs to support the flood response:
Marie Dalton
Rae Green
Michelle Anderson
Councillors, please join me in showing our appreciation to these magnificent Redlanders.
4.2 Retirement of Mary McDougall
Deputy Mayor Julie Talty recognised the retirement of Mary McDougall.
Councillors, it gives me great pleasure to acknowledge Mary McDougall for her 39 years of service to Redland City Council and wish her well in her retirement, commencing 21 February 2025.
Mary joined Redland Shire Council 39 years ago as a casual Data Input Operator in 1986. Little did she know, she would come to live and breathe all things ‘Redland City Council’ for the rest of her working life.
It wasn’t long before her capabilities were recognised and she was appointed permanently as the Data Input Operator within the Accounts Team in 1987 and then Stores in 1988, where she stayed for an impressive 16 years.
Mary’s longstanding tenure and experience working within Council equipped her with all the financial and inventory management capabilities that paved the way to her next role as a Senior Supply Systems and Accounts Officer. This was a role that Mary excelled in and delivered for the next seven years.
In 2011, Mary’s career pivoted slightly, and she officially entered the world of procurement, first as a Procurement Officer, and from 2021 as the Procurement Process Administrator, where she continued to serve Council until her well-earned retirement, commencing on Friday.
Whilst Mary’s career timeline can be succinctly summarised, her role and working contributions to Council are not so easy. Mary McDougall was a name very well-known, and many would consider her one of the beating hearts of Council. She was the person you asked when no-one else knew the answer. She had a front seat in many reviews, audits, business changes, system implementations and process developments and became somewhat of a walking encyclopedia or history lesson in Council operations. During her time within Procurement, Mary tirelessly supported Stores Operations, was the central responsible officer for the processing of all of Council’s transactional purchasing, kept both our field and corporate staff clothed in Council uniforms, managed and maintained our financial Creditors, managed Council’s stationery account and a myriad of other tasks that kept Council running smoothly.
Mary’s commitment to the job was unwavering with her typically in the office before anyone else and being strongly encouraged to head home when the rest of us were ready to turn the lights off. COVID lockdown was particularly challenging for our very work focused friend as her home contains the one secret weapon that could stop her working her usual long hours. Mary would be toiling away in her office, head buried in her work, but when her beloved cat decided that mum had worked enough, the crying at the door was all it took for Mary to finally give up and shut down her computer for the day.
Mary, as you head into your very well deserved retirement, we thank you for all the time, effort, commitment and valuable contributions that you have given not only to Council, but also to the staff you have worked alongside and the Redland City community that we serve.
5 Receipt and Confirmation of Minutes
|
Council Resolution 2025/10 Moved by: Cr Paul Bishop Seconded by: Cr Paul Gollè That the minutes of the General Meeting held on 22 January 2025 be confirmed. Carried 11/0 Crs Jos Mitchell, Wendy Boglary, Peter Mitchell, Paul Gollè, Lance Hewlett, Shane Rendalls, Julie Talty, Rowanne McKenzie, Tracey Huges, Jason Colley and Paul Bishop voted FOR the motion. |
6 Declaration of Prescribed Conflict of Interests and Declarable Conflict of Interests
6.1 Declarable Conflict of Interest – Councillor Lance Hewlett
Councillor Lance Hewlett declared a Declarable Conflict of Interest in relation to Item 20.3 Public Tracks and Trails on Private Land, stating that he was previously a close friend of one of the owners of one of the parcels of land listed in this report.
Councillor Lance Hewlett chose to exclude himself from the meeting while the matter was being discussed and the vote taken.
6.2 Declarable Conflict of Interest – Mayor Jos Mitchell
Mayor Jos Mitchell declared a Declarable Conflict of Interest in relation to Item 20.3 Public Tracks and Trails on Private Land, stating that she believes that non-factual statements made about her by one of the landowners during the election campaign may affect her impartiality.
Mayor Jos Mitchell chose to exclude herself from the meeting while the matter was being discussed and the vote taken.
7 Matters Outstanding from Previous Council Meetings
7.1 Draft Birkdale Community Precinct Local Government Infrastructure Designation Consultation Report
At the General Meeting 13 September 2023 (Item 14.1 refers), Council resolved as follows:
1. To endorse the Birkdale Community Precinct Local Government Infrastructure Designation Consultation Summary Report, including responses to submissions.
2. To note that officers will continue to progress amendments to the Birkdale Community Precinct Local Government Infrastructure Designation based on the Consultation Report, and that a report seeking Council endorsement to make the designation will be brought to a future meeting of Council.
3. To thank the community for its participation in the consultation.
A report will be brought to a future meeting of Council.
7.2 Indoor Sports Facilities Planning
At the General Meeting 18 September (Item 16.1 refers), Council resolved as follows:
1. To endorse officers to investigate opportunities for a new indoor sports facility to be established in Redlands Coast as a legacy outcome in the lead up to the Brisbane 2032 Olympic and Paralympic Games.
2. To endorse the development of an Indoor Sports Facility Action Plan for the Redlands Coast identifying priority locations, funding requirements and opportunities for refurbishing existing facilities to obtain a minimum of six indoor courts.
3. To endorse the development of a feasibility study on the priority site(s) identified by the indoor sports court action plan.
4. To bring a report to Council on the outcomes of Brisbane 2032 Olympic and Paralympic Games indoor sports facility investigation and the Indoor Sports Facility Action Plan.
A report will be brought to a future meeting of Council.
7.3 Petition - Cr Shane Rendalls - Request for Council to Reverse the Full Cost Recovery Policy for Moreton Bay Marine Facilities
At the General Meeting 20 November 2024 (Item 10.2 refers), Council resolved as follows:
That the petition be received and referred to the Chief Executive Officer for consideration and a report to the local government.
A report will be brought to a future meeting of Council.
7.4 Council's Programs Related to the Environmental Protection Biodiversity Act - Response to Notice of Motion
At the General Meeting 21 August 2024 (Item 15.1 refers), Council resolved as follows:
That Council resolves to note this report and a further detailed report be provided on the programs and infrastructure provision including expenditure, both operational and capital, in relation to koalas and threatened species management, and native vegetation rehabilitation and revegetation.
A report addressing this matter was discussed at Item 15.1.
|
Council Resolution 2025/11 Moved by: Cr Wendy Boglary Seconded by: Cr Paul Bishop That Council suspend standing orders for a five minute public participation segment. Carried 11/0 Crs Jos Mitchell, Wendy Boglary, Peter Mitchell, Paul Gollè, Lance Hewlett, Shane Rendalls, Julie Talty, Rowanne McKenzie, Tracey Huges, Jason Colley and Paul Bishop voted FOR the motion. |
|
Council Resolution 2025/12 Moved by: Cr Paul Gollè Seconded by: Cr Tracey Huges That Council resume standing orders. Carried 11/0 Crs Jos Mitchell, Wendy Boglary, Peter Mitchell, Paul Gollè, Lance Hewlett, Shane Rendalls, Julie Talty, Rowanne McKenzie, Tracey Huges, Jason Colley and Paul Bishop voted FOR the motion. |
11 Motion to Alter the Order of Business
|
Council Resolution 2025/13 Moved by: Cr Shane Rendalls Seconded by: Cr Peter Mitchell Carried 11/0 Crs Jos Mitchell, Wendy Boglary, Peter Mitchell, Paul Gollè, Lance Hewlett, Shane Rendalls, Julie Talty, Rowanne McKenzie, Tracey Huges, Jason Colley and Paul Bishop voted FOR the motion. |
13 Reports from Organisational Services
13.1 January 2025 Monthly Financial Report
Objective Reference: A11807664
Authorising Officer: Sandra Bridgeman, Executive Group Manager Financial Services & Chief Financial Officer
Responsible Officer: Peter Paterson, Financial Controller
Report Author: Udaya Panambala Arachchilage, Corporate Financial Reporting Manager
Attachments: 1. January 2025 Monthly Financial Report ⇩
Purpose
To note the year to date financial results as at 31 January 2025.
Background
Council adopts an annual budget and then reports on performance against the budget on a monthly basis. This is not only a legislative requirement but enables the organisation to periodically review its financial performance and position and respond to changes in community requirements, market forces or other outside influences.
2024-2025 first budget review
Council adopted its revised budget at the General Meeting on 18 December 2024 and the updated budget numbers are reflected in this report.
Strategic Implications
Council has either achieved or favourably exceeded the following key financial sustainability ratios as at the end of January 2025.
· Operating Surplus Ratio
· Operating Cash Ratio
· Unrestricted Cash Expense Cover Ratio
· Asset Consumption Ratio
· Leverage Ratio
· Net Financial Liabilities Ratio
The Council-Controlled Revenue, Population Growth, and Asset Renewal Funding Ratios are reported for contextual purposes only. Population Growth and Asset Renewal Funding Ratios will not materially change from month to month.
Legislative Requirements
The January 2025 financial report is presented in accordance with the legislative requirement of section 204(2) of the Local Government Regulation 2012, requiring the Chief Executive Officer to present the financial report to a monthly Council meeting.
Risk Management
The January 2025 financial report has been noted by the Executive Leadership Team and relevant officers who can provide further clarification and advice around actual to budget variances.
Financial
There is no direct financial impact to Council as a result of this report, however it provides an indication of financial outcomes at the end of January 2025.
People
Nil impact expected as the purpose of the attached report is to provide financial information to Council based upon actual versus budgeted financial activity.
Environmental
Nil impact expected as the purpose of the attached report is to provide financial information to Council based upon actual versus budgeted financial activity.
Social
Nil impact expected as the purpose of the attached report is to provide financial information to Council based upon actual versus budgeted financial activity.
Human Rights
There are no human rights implications from this report as the purpose of the attached report is to provide financial information to Council based upon actual versus budgeted financial activity.
Alignment with Council's Policy and Plans
This report has a relationship with the following items of Council’s Our Future Redlands – A Corporate Plan to 2026 and Beyond:
Efficient and effective organisation objectives
7.1 Improve the efficiency and effectiveness of Council’s service delivery to decrease costs, and enhance customer experience and community outcomes.
7.4 Demonstrate good governance through transparent, accountable processes and sustainable practices and asset management.
Consultation
|
Consulted |
Date |
Comment |
|
Council departmental officers |
Year to date 31 January 2025 |
Consulted on financial results and outcomes. |
|
Financial Services Group officers |
Year to date 31 January 2025 |
Consulted on financial results and outcomes. |
|
Executive Leadership Team and Senior Leadership Team |
Year to date 31 January 2025 |
Recipients of variance analysis between actual and budget. Consulted as required. |
Options
Option One
That Council resolves to note the financial position, results and ratios for January 2025 as presented in the attached Monthly Financial Report.
Option Two
That Council resolves to request additional information.
|
Officer's Recommendation 2025/14 Moved by: Cr Paul Bishop Seconded by: Cr Paul Gollè That Council resolves to note the financial position, results and ratios for January 2025 as presented in the attached Monthly Financial Report. Carried 11/0 Crs Jos Mitchell, Wendy Boglary, Peter Mitchell, Paul Gollè, Lance Hewlett, Shane Rendalls, Julie Talty, Rowanne McKenzie, Tracey Huges, Jason Colley and Paul Bishop voted FOR the motion. |
General Meeting Minutes 19 February 2025
This page is a placeholder for a single page of a PDF attachment. It will be replaced by the actual PDF page when the PDF version of this document is generated.
Report: January 2025 Monthly Financial Report
Attachment: January 2025 Monthly Financial Report
Page: 1
This page is a placeholder for a single page of a PDF attachment. It will be replaced by the actual PDF page when the PDF version of this document is generated.
Report: January 2025 Monthly Financial Report
Attachment: January 2025 Monthly Financial Report
Page: 2
This page is a placeholder for a single page of a PDF attachment. It will be replaced by the actual PDF page when the PDF version of this document is generated.
Report: January 2025 Monthly Financial Report
Attachment: January 2025 Monthly Financial Report
Page: 3
This page is a placeholder for a single page of a PDF attachment. It will be replaced by the actual PDF page when the PDF version of this document is generated.
Report: January 2025 Monthly Financial Report
Attachment: January 2025 Monthly Financial Report
Page: 4
This page is a placeholder for a single page of a PDF attachment. It will be replaced by the actual PDF page when the PDF version of this document is generated.
Report: January 2025 Monthly Financial Report
Attachment: January 2025 Monthly Financial Report
Page: 5
This page is a placeholder for a single page of a PDF attachment. It will be replaced by the actual PDF page when the PDF version of this document is generated.
Report: January 2025 Monthly Financial Report
Attachment: January 2025 Monthly Financial Report
Page: 6
This page is a placeholder for a single page of a PDF attachment. It will be replaced by the actual PDF page when the PDF version of this document is generated.
Report: January 2025 Monthly Financial Report
Attachment: January 2025 Monthly Financial Report
Page: 7
This page is a placeholder for a single page of a PDF attachment. It will be replaced by the actual PDF page when the PDF version of this document is generated.
Report: January 2025 Monthly Financial Report
Attachment: January 2025 Monthly Financial Report
Page: 8
This page is a placeholder for a single page of a PDF attachment. It will be replaced by the actual PDF page when the PDF version of this document is generated.
Report: January 2025 Monthly Financial Report
Attachment: January 2025 Monthly Financial Report
Page: 9
This page is a placeholder for a single page of a PDF attachment. It will be replaced by the actual PDF page when the PDF version of this document is generated.
Report: January 2025 Monthly Financial Report
Attachment: January 2025 Monthly Financial Report
Page: 10
This page is a placeholder for a single page of a PDF attachment. It will be replaced by the actual PDF page when the PDF version of this document is generated.
Report: January 2025 Monthly Financial Report
Attachment: January 2025 Monthly Financial Report
Page: 11
This page is a placeholder for a single page of a PDF attachment. It will be replaced by the actual PDF page when the PDF version of this document is generated.
Report: January 2025 Monthly Financial Report
Attachment: January 2025 Monthly Financial Report
Page: 12
This page is a placeholder for a single page of a PDF attachment. It will be replaced by the actual PDF page when the PDF version of this document is generated.
Report: January 2025 Monthly Financial Report
Attachment: January 2025 Monthly Financial Report
Page: 13
This page is a placeholder for a single page of a PDF attachment. It will be replaced by the actual PDF page when the PDF version of this document is generated.
Report: January 2025 Monthly Financial Report
Attachment: January 2025 Monthly Financial Report
Page: 14
14 Reports from Advocacy, ajor Projects and Economic Development
14.1 2025 Federal Election Advocacy
Objective Reference: A11759505
Authorising Officer: Christopher Isles, General Manager Advocacy, Major Projects & Economic Development
Responsible Officer: Natasha Comber, Group Manager Economic Development & Investment
Report Author: Kate Turner, Senior Advocacy & Government Relations Officer
Attachments: 1. Redland City Council 2025 Federal Election Advocacy ⇩
Purpose
To seek Council endorsement of 2025 Federal Election Advocacy Priorities as outlined in Attachment 1 of this report, for the upcoming federal election.
Background
A key component of serving the Redlands Coast community is the development of strong relationships with other levels of government to help deliver the projects and initiatives needed to support our community. In the lead up to the 2025 Australian Federal Election, Council has identified several priorities we are seeking Federal Government support to deliver. On behalf of the Redlands Coast community, Council will use the endorsed federal election advocacy priorities to advocate to candidates and parties contesting the election and request their support. Following the election Council will work with the Federal Government and successful Members of Parliament to progress these projects to the benefit of the community.
Issues
A key role of Local Government is to advocate on behalf of their community, with Councils regularly advocating to both the Federal and State Governments for key projects and initiatives. This advocacy takes several forms including formalised advocacy such as election advocacy, resolutions to Local Government Association of Queensland (LGAQ) annual conference and individual advocacy by elected members on behalf of their community. Council’s advocacy is a rolling program that evolves based on the needs of the community and priorities of Council. The included priorities have been identified and many are currently being progressed by Council as part of its corporate and or operational plans.
Strategic Implications
Legislative Requirements
There are no legislative requirements to consider.
Risk Management
To minimise the risk of conflicting uncoordinated messaging, a consolidated coordinated approach is recommended for implementing 2025 federal election advocacy.
Financial
Advocacy has the potential to secure Federal Government financial support, delivering a potential positive financial outcome for Council.
People
The are no implications for staff associated with this report. If adopted, the advocacy priorities will be outworked as part of the business-as-usual activity.
Environmental
There are no implications for the environment associated with this report.
Social
There are no social implications associated with this report.
Human Rights
There are no human rights implications associated with this report.
Alignment with Council's Policy and Plans
The 2025 federal election advocacy program supports the objectives and outcomes of Council’s Corporate and Operational Plans.
Consultation
|
Consultation Date |
Comments/Actions |
|
|
Councillor Officers/Subject Matter Experts |
November 2024 – January 2025 |
Various |
|
Councillors |
January 2025 |
Feedback opportunity via online survey |
Options
Option One
That Council resolves as follows:
1. To endorse the 2025 Federal Election Advocacy Priorities as outlined in Attachment 1.
2. To delegate to the Chief Executive Officer to make minor administrative changes to Attachment 1.
3. To send a copy of the endorsed 2025 Federal Election Advocacy Priorities to candidates and parties contesting the 2025 Australian Federal Election.
4. To deliver a communications campaign to support advocacy efforts.
Option Two
That Council resolves as follows:
1. To not endorse the 2025 Federal Election Advocacy Priorities as outlined in Attachment 1 and request officers prepare an alternative set of priorities for Council’s future considerations.
2. To send a copy of the endorsed 2025 Federal Election Advocacy Priorities to candidates and parties contesting the Australian Federal Election.
3. To deliver a communications campaign to support advocacy efforts.
|
Officer's Recommendation 2025/15 Moved by: Cr Jason Colley Seconded by: Cr Wendy Boglary That Council resolves as follows: 1. To endorse the 2025 Federal Election Advocacy Priorities as outlined in Attachment 1. 2. To delegate to the Chief Executive Officer to make minor administrative changes to Attachment 1. 3. To send a copy of the endorsed 2025 Federal Election Advocacy Priorities to candidates and parties contesting the 2025 Australian Federal Election. 4. To deliver a communications campaign to support advocacy efforts. Carried 11/0 Crs Jos Mitchell, Wendy Boglary, Peter Mitchell, Paul Gollè, Lance Hewlett, Shane Rendalls, Julie Talty, Rowanne McKenzie, Tracey Huges, Jason Colley and Paul Bishop voted FOR the motion. |
General Meeting Minutes 19 February 2025
This page is a placeholder for a single page of a PDF attachment. It will be replaced by the actual PDF page when the PDF version of this document is generated.
Report: 2025 Federal Election Advocacy
Attachment: Redland City Council 2025 Federal Election Advocacy
Page: 1
This page is a placeholder for a single page of a PDF attachment. It will be replaced by the actual PDF page when the PDF version of this document is generated.
Report: 2025 Federal Election Advocacy
Attachment: Redland City Council 2025 Federal Election Advocacy
Page: 2
This page is a placeholder for a single page of a PDF attachment. It will be replaced by the actual PDF page when the PDF version of this document is generated.
Report: 2025 Federal Election Advocacy
Attachment: Redland City Council 2025 Federal Election Advocacy
Page: 3
This page is a placeholder for a single page of a PDF attachment. It will be replaced by the actual PDF page when the PDF version of this document is generated.
Report: 2025 Federal Election Advocacy
Attachment: Redland City Council 2025 Federal Election Advocacy
Page: 4
This page is a placeholder for a single page of a PDF attachment. It will be replaced by the actual PDF page when the PDF version of this document is generated.
Report: 2025 Federal Election Advocacy
Attachment: Redland City Council 2025 Federal Election Advocacy
Page: 5
This page is a placeholder for a single page of a PDF attachment. It will be replaced by the actual PDF page when the PDF version of this document is generated.
Report: 2025 Federal Election Advocacy
Attachment: Redland City Council 2025 Federal Election Advocacy
Page: 6
This page is a placeholder for a single page of a PDF attachment. It will be replaced by the actual PDF page when the PDF version of this document is generated.
Report: 2025 Federal Election Advocacy
Attachment: Redland City Council 2025 Federal Election Advocacy
Page: 7
This page is a placeholder for a single page of a PDF attachment. It will be replaced by the actual PDF page when the PDF version of this document is generated.
Report: 2025 Federal Election Advocacy
Attachment: Redland City Council 2025 Federal Election Advocacy
Page: 8
This page is a placeholder for a single page of a PDF attachment. It will be replaced by the actual PDF page when the PDF version of this document is generated.
Report: 2025 Federal Election Advocacy
Attachment: Redland City Council 2025 Federal Election Advocacy
Page: 9
This page is a placeholder for a single page of a PDF attachment. It will be replaced by the actual PDF page when the PDF version of this document is generated.
Report: 2025 Federal Election Advocacy
Attachment: Redland City Council 2025 Federal Election Advocacy
Page: 10
This page is a placeholder for a single page of a PDF attachment. It will be replaced by the actual PDF page when the PDF version of this document is generated.
Report: 2025 Federal Election Advocacy
Attachment: Redland City Council 2025 Federal Election Advocacy
Page: 11
This page is a placeholder for a single page of a PDF attachment. It will be replaced by the actual PDF page when the PDF version of this document is generated.
Report: 2025 Federal Election Advocacy
Attachment: Redland City Council 2025 Federal Election Advocacy
Page: 12
This page is a placeholder for a single page of a PDF attachment. It will be replaced by the actual PDF page when the PDF version of this document is generated.
Report: 2025 Federal Election Advocacy
Attachment: Redland City Council 2025 Federal Election Advocacy
Page: 13
This page is a placeholder for a single page of a PDF attachment. It will be replaced by the actual PDF page when the PDF version of this document is generated.
Report: 2025 Federal Election Advocacy
Attachment: Redland City Council 2025 Federal Election Advocacy
Page: 14
This page is a placeholder for a single page of a PDF attachment. It will be replaced by the actual PDF page when the PDF version of this document is generated.
Report: 2025 Federal Election Advocacy
Attachment: Redland City Council 2025 Federal Election Advocacy
Page: 15
This page is a placeholder for a single page of a PDF attachment. It will be replaced by the actual PDF page when the PDF version of this document is generated.
Report: 2025 Federal Election Advocacy
Attachment: Redland City Council 2025 Federal Election Advocacy
Page: 16
15 Reports from Community & Customer Services
15.1 Council's Programs Related to the Environmental Protection Biodiversity Act - Response to Notice of Motion
Objective Reference: A11739690
Authorising Officer: David Jeanes, Acting General Manager Community & Customer Services
Responsible Officer: Graham Simpson, Group Manager Environment & Regulation
Report Author: Graham Simpson, Group Manager Environment & Regulation
Purpose
To provide a further response to the Notice of Motion and Council resolution from the General Meeting of 19 July 2023 seeking a report on Council’s environment programs relevant to the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999.
An interim response was provided at the General Meeting of 21 August 2024, which was noted by Council and sought a further detailed report.
Background
A Notice of Motion was tabled at the General Meeting held on 19 July 2023 for a report of Council’s programs related to the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act). Council resolved as follows:
1. That Council undertakes a comprehensive report on the programs and infrastructure provision including expenditure, both operational and capital, in relation to koalas and threatened species management, and native vegetation rehabilitation and revegetation.
2. That a report be brought back to Council, and made publicly available on the Council website, explaining the success or other outcomes over the last ten years, and where known, planned in the coming five years in relation to koalas and threatened species management, and native vegetation rehabilitation and revegetation.
3. That the report be provided to the Federal Government to assist in Environmental Protection Biosecurity Conservation (EPBC) assessment of community infrastructure.
An interim report was provided at the General Meeting of 21 August 2024, which provided details regarding the above Notice of Motion concerning:
· Environmental legacy
· Environmental Regulation – Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act (EPBC)
· Environmental Offsets, including Advanced Offsets
· Conservation Planning Approach
· Nature Positive Plan
The interim report effectively dealt with Council’s legacy and planning relating to EPBC matters, but more detail was required regarding point 1 of the Notice of Motion.
Therefore, this report seeks to provide more detailed information on the programs and infrastructure provision including expenditure, both operational and capital, in relation to Council’s environment program including koalas and threatened species management, and native vegetation rehabilitation and revegetation.
Issues
Environment Program
As part of Council’s 2024/25 budget process for the Environment and Coastal Management Special Charge (Environment Levy), it was determined that additional information concerning Council’s environment program would assist with understanding the strategic priorities and operational delivery of associated services and activities.
As a result, during October 2024, two Councillor workshops were held which went into detail about Council’s environment program, including:
· Council’s role and responsibilities
· The importance of Council’s environment program
· Planning and delivery of the program
As a local government, Council is responsible as the primary level of government, for implementing state and national environmental laws and achieving ecological sustainability through dealing with local landscape level environmental matters.
As referenced in Council’s Corporate Plan Our Future Redlands – A Corporate Plan to 2026 and Beyond, our environment enhances our identity, lifestyle, wellbeing, economy and cultural values. This provides opportunities to be immersed in our naturally wonderful environment and drive our commitment to protect and enhance our natural assets.
Redlands has an enviable conservation estate with a high level of biodiversity that requires significant investment to ensure it is managed and maintained to a standard that protects and enhances it value as habitat and to the community.
Some key information about the environment on Redlands Coast is as follows:
Figure 1 – High level environmental information - Redlands
Figure 2 – Greenspace across Redlands (showing spatially the extent of conservation areas)
The above figures demonstrate the scale of the commitment needed by Council and the community to fulfil our responsibilities to the environment.
Council discharges this responsibility through deciding on environmental policy settings and budgets, which are informed by detailed planning and delivery of an environment program using scientific principles that can ensure beneficial outcomes for both ecosystems and the community.
Council’s Environment Program can be broadly summarised, using the headings in Our Future Redlands - A Corporate Plan to 2026 and Beyond as below:
Figure 3 – Corporate Plan alignment
Overwhelmingly, Council’s core environment program sits within the Natural Environment goal within the Corporate Plan. For example, the Corporate Plan has key initiatives listed in the Natural Environment goal such as:
· Deliver the Redlands Coast Wildlife Connections Plan through Council's wildlife connections program.
· Deliver the Redlands Coast Koala Conservation Plan through Council's koala conservation program.
· Implement Council’s fire management program.
· Explore and implement opportunities to proactively reduce Council’s carbon footprint.
· Implement the Coastal Hazards Adaptation Strategy (CHAS) across Redlands Coast.
· Deliver the Redlands Coast Biosecurity Plan through Council's biosecurity program.
· Continue to provide an education program to the Redlands Coast community to support, enhance and encourage environmental understanding and grow environmental connections.
· Deliver the Redlands Coast Bay and Creeks Plan through Council's bay and creeks program.
· To help Council focus on the future horizon there are a range of strategies and plans (Implementation Plans) that enable us to progress environmental outcomes across the city. These plans and strategies all directly impact the environment in the city.
· These Implementation Plans are in place to ensure we gear our environmental programs and funding towards outcomes that follow expert research and conservation methodology. Generally, all Council’s Environmental Plans and Strategies are underpinned by four fundamental environmental planning principles.
Figure 4 – Environmental Planning Principles
These principles provide a consistent theme for how Council decides what is important for strategic direction, tactical decisions and operational programs/services. These decisions are aimed at ensuring there is impactful interventions with the resources we apply to Council’s environment programs.
Environment Program Categories
Council’s core environment program involves a range of initiatives centred around the protection, management, promotion, and enhancement of biodiversity, and includes:
· Land acquisition for purchasing significant and important conservation areas.
· Conservation land maintenance including environmental weed management and fire mitigation.
· Enhancement and rehabilitation of conservation areas and corridors through habitat improvement and planting programs.
· Wildlife programs including Redlands After-hours Wildlife Ambulance and Redlands Wildlife Care Network.
· Threatened species programs such as Council’s Koala Conservation Program.
· Environmental extension and education programs for the community such as Bushcare, Land for Wildlife, Waterways extension and Habitat Protection.
To assist in understanding Council’s environmental programs and how they are supported by policy and budget settings, it is useful to place services and activities into nine categories (service categories).
These service categories allow for effective grouping of functions and activities associated with Council’s core environment program. These categories are:
1. Conservation area maintenance
2. Fire management
3. Trail maintenance
4. Fauna management
5. Waterway management
6. Corridor management
7. Environmental education
8. Conservation administration*
9. Coastal protection*
These service categories have specific inclusions and are supported by key Implementation Plans. The following table provides information relating to each of the service categories, including strategic alignment to policy and the key activities undertaken:
|
Service Category |
Implementation Plan/s |
Key Activities |
|
Conservation area maintenance |
Conservation Land Management Strategy 2010 Biosecurity Plan 2018 |
· Vegetation management · Rehabilitation · Weed management · Pest animals · Strategic land conservation maintenance – Birkdale, Heinemann Road etc. · Voluntary Conservation Program · Habitat Protection Program · Mainland and Island tree programs |
|
Fire management |
Redland City Local Disaster Management Plan Conservation Land Management Strategy 2010 |
· Mainland, North Stradbroke Island (NSI) and Southern Moreton Bay Islands (SMBI) fire management programs · Fire management zones · Fire regime assessment · Fire buffers and trails · Planned burn program |
|
Trail maintenance |
Conservation Land Management Strategy 2010 Seven C’s Connection Strategy 2011 Redland Open Space Strategy 2012 |
· Tracks and trails improvement and maintenance · Footbridge and boardwalk maintenance · Erosion and sediment control |
|
Fauna management |
Wildlife Connections Plan 2018 Koala Conservation Strategy 2021 |
· Koala conservation Program – research, monitoring and management · Koala conservation agreement program · Threatened species and fauna management · Redlands After-hours Wildlife Ambulance (RAWA) · Flying Fox roost management |
|
Waterway management |
Bay and Creeks Plan 2021 Conservation Land Management Strategy 2010 |
· Gross Pollutant Trap and Water Sensitive Design infrastructure maintenance · Waterway management plans · Resilient Rivers program · Waterways extension program · Aquatic weed control · Water quality monitoring · Catchment planting and maintenance |
|
Corridor management |
Wildlife Connections Plan 2018 Koala Conservation Strategy 2021 |
· One million native plants program* *removed in 2024-2025 · Conservation land acquisitions · Environmental offsets · Koala habitat restoration |
|
Environmental education |
All above |
· Environmental education and community events · Environmental communications · School program · Your backyard program · Community Bushcare |
|
Conservation administration* (*includes indirect costs) |
Nil |
· Employee costs for core conservation labour · Administrative costs · Internal Council charges |
|
Coastal protection* (*included as part of Environment levy in 2021/22) |
Coastal Hazard Adaptation Strategy 2021 |
· Beach erosion rectification · Beach nourishment · Shoreline and seawall erosion management · Amity and Coochiemudlo SEMPs · Amity Point flowside research · Marine works administration |
Table 1 – Service Categories
Service Category - Conservation Area Management – case study
To put Table 1 in context, Council’s environment program and the subsequent budget funded by the Environment Levy and operational budget, has a strong focus on managing Council’s conservation areas, which range from large scale areas (such as Bayview Conservation Area and Eastern Escarpment) to medium scale conservation areas (such as Greater Glider Conservation Area), through to numerous smaller conservation reserves scattered across the City.
The number and diversity of conservations areas creates a challenge in managing these natural assets, given they are dissected by roads, housing, various urban and rural land uses, infrastructure and recreational parks. These things place pressure on conservation areas by causing edge effects, such as biosecurity risks (weeds, feral animals), which require management by Council.
In general, smaller conservation areas have a proportionally higher cost to manage edge effects. Given the composition of Council’s conservation reserves this requires a significant budget to manage these impacts.
Figure 5 – Edge Effect Impact on Conservation Areas
Conservation area management significantly contributes to protecting, managing and enhancing the City’s conservation areas. A review of those conservation areas has banded them as follows, which directly impacts the budget needed for ongoing maintenance and improvement:
Figure 6 – Banding of Conservation areas (across City)
Figure 6 indicates the importance of seeking to improve conservation areas, through a holistic approach to management, to ultimately improve the banding of conservation areas and resultant costs to maintain.
Environment Program budget
As noted in the interim report to Council in August 2024, the programs that have helped establish or support Redlands conservation effort are primarily funded out of the Environment Levy – which was first established in the 1990s.
Council has spent close to $36M on strategic conservation land acquisitions since 1993, bringing into public ownership around 1,313 hectares of land with high environmental values. This includes land that forms part of core habitat areas, environmental corridors and broader functional precincts.
It is important to note that over the last 10 years that the Environment Levy has evolved from a primary focus on strategic acquisition of privately owned conservation land, to the maintenance of those strategic acquisitions and the broader conservation estate owned or managed by Council.
The Environment Levy (and the environment program budget more broadly) has also experienced several significant shifts over the last 10 years in what activities it includes for funding. This is based on the broad definition of the Environment Levy and the increasing demands on Council to effectively manage biodiversity, our conservation estate, and coastal processes.
The Environment Levy is defined as follows:
· Council has determined that the community in general will benefit from (1) the protection, management, promotion and enhancement of biodiversity and (2) the management of foreshores and mitigation of coastal hazards.
· Environmental management includes programs of work including fire management, bushland regeneration and weed management for bushland and conservation areas, education and awareness programs, green spaces, water ways, catchments, and ecosystems across the city.
· Coastal Management includes foreshore maintenance activities, as well as enacting the recommendations of Shoreline Erosion Management Plans and Coastal Hazard Adaptation Strategy to manage and protect significant community assets and values.
Understanding the catalysts for the ongoing shift in environment program funding is important when considering the budgets assigned to the environment program. This shift in the intention and program funding by the Environment Levy over the last 10 years is summarised in the below table:
|
Financial year |
Inclusion/commentary |
Levy impact |
|
2015/16 |
Base year |
N/A |
|
2016/17 |
Significant land purchases Heinemann Road (part) Bligh Street |
Environment acquisition reserve acquitted ($0 balance) |
|
2017/18 |
Significant land purchase – South Street Commencement of Koala Conservation Strategy (KCS) |
Fauna management service category increased to fund KCS (ongoing) |
|
2018/19 |
QFES SMBI Fire Management Report recommendations |
Fire management service category increased to fund recommendations (ongoing) |
|
2019/20 |
Significant land purchase – Birkdale land (in part) Commencement of new Biosecurity Plan |
Conservation area maintenance service category increased to fund Biosecurity Plan uplift and strategic land maintenance (ongoing) |
|
2020/21 |
No significant changes |
N/A |
|
2021/22 |
Commencement of Coastal Hazard Adaptation Strategy (CHAS) Shift to levy of Gross Pollutant Trap (GPT) and Water Sensitive Urban Design (WSUD) maintenance |
Coastal protection service category commenced (ongoing) Waterway management service category increased to fund GPT and WSUD maintenance (ongoing) |
|
2022/23 |
Budget for employee costs for conservation area management redistributed increasing transparency on full cost of program |
Reallocation of budget to appropriate service category, increasing levy (ongoing) |
|
2023/24 |
Further shift to levy of conservation area management costs to provide transparency on full cost of program to include internal costs |
Conservation area management category increased (ongoing) |
|
2024/25 |
Shift of a range of environmental education and community partnership expenditure to provide transparency on full cost of program |
Increases to environmental education and corridor management service categories (ongoing) |
Table 2 – Significant inclusions into Environment Levy past 10 years
Table 2 is important in understanding that over the last 10 years there has been increased use of the Environment Levy for funding Council’s environment program, which has meant it has increased in a non-linear way as a funding source.
This trend is because of:
· A shift away from conservation land acquisition to conservation land maintenance.
· The emergence of increasing hazards (e.g. bushfire, coastal protection, biosecurity).
· The emerging needs to protect threatened species (e.g. koalas).
· A desire to align the environment program service categories to be funded by the levy to better represent the full cost of environmental programs – resulting in increased transparency on the program expenditure.
For example, in the 2024/25 financial year, expenditure in environmental education and community partnerships that was previously funded by general rates revenue, was shifted to the Environment Levy for funding to increase transparency around Council’s funding of these programs. This helps in more clearly distinguishing Council’s actual spend on core conservation programs in accordance with the purpose of the levy.
Financial information
As requested by the Notice of Motion, the below graphs and tables provide the detailed financial information on expenditure.
It is important to note that the below financial information is provided on the following basis:
· The financial job numbers and natural accounts used to collate the information have often changed over time. The allocation of jobs to each service category has also changed over time as budget practices have matured and, in some instances, is reflected in this data as significant changes to costs within a service category.
· As a result, the financial information is considered accurate but relies on some assumptions and high-level assessment of the activities included in budgets assigned to service categories.
· While the Environment Levy funds a significant portion of Council’s environment program it has not and continues to not fund all the program (yet).
· As such, budgets from relevant Units of Council that are considered to deliver the core environment program not currently funded by the levy, have been included in some graphs to provide as much accuracy as possible on the total environment program expenditure.
· The budget figures provided include Council’s internal charges for organisational services, such as information technology, human resource management and financial services, applied to those budgets and job numbers.
Environment Levy
To begin to understand the historic expenditure associated with Council’s core environment program, a 10-year graph showing the expenditure (actual spend) solely from the Environment Levy is provided below. This graph provides information on the total expenditure and trendline of funding raised via the levy.
Figure 7 – Total Environment Levy actual expenditure and trend – 10 years
Table 3 – Total Environment Levy actual expenditure and trend – 10 years
* Note 2024/25 represents provided budget not actual expenditure.
Figure 7 and Table 3 are to be read in conjunction with Table 2 earlier in the report which assists in describing the shifts in the Environment Levy budget over the last 10 years. In total over the last 10 financial years, Council has spent $104M using the Environment Levy, which equates to $10.4M p.a on average.
Figure 7 and Table 3 are to be read in conjunction with Table 2 earlier in the report which assists in describing the shifts in the Environment Levy budget over the last 10 years.
Figure 8 – Environment Program Service Categories funded by Levy – 10 years
Table 4 – Environment Program Service Categories funded by Levy – 10 years
Figure 8 and Table 4 break up the Environment Levy budget by allocation to the environment program service categories. It assists in seeing the changes over time to each category and again should be read in conjunction with Table 2 provided earlier in the report.
For example, it can be seen under the Coastal Protection service category, that the decision to include coastal protection in the Environment Levy in 2021/22 increases the total amount raised by the levy.
Total Environment Program spend
Council’s core environment program as detailed in the service categories listed earlier in the report, is funded through a combination of funding from the Environment Levy and general rates revenue.
Therefore, in accordance with the request under the Notice of Motion, the below graphs and table are useful in assisting with showing the full expenditure associated with the core environment program.
Noting the limitations associated with sourcing the financial data given budget movement across various job numbers and natural accounts, the information included is based on some assumptions and high-level assessment of the activities included in budgets and jobs assigned to service categories.
This has meant that to most accurately show the full budget expenditure a five-year time period has been applied, rather than 10 years.
Figure 9 – Total Environment Program Expenditure (Actuals) – 5 years
Table 5 – Total Environment Program Expenditure (Actuals) – 5 years
* Note 2024/25 represents provided budget not actual expenditure.
Figure 9 and Table 5 indicate that Council has spent approximately $68M in the last five years on the core environment program.
Notably, the amount of budget funded outside the Environment Levy is reducing as part of the strategic intention to ensure that there is transparency of expenditure on Council’s core environment program now and into the future.
Over the last five years, the proportion of the core environment program budget that is funded outside the levy by general rates revenue has dropped from 25.1% of total expenditure to just 4.98%. This means that the core environment program now makes up less than 1% of general rates revenue.
This shift, combined with detailed service planning currently underway, has significant advantages in allowing Council to be able to clearly see the total spend across the core environment program service categories, funded ideally in total by the Environment Levy.
This will provide Council with the flexibility to adjust expenditure annually to reflect current priorities based on the strategic policy approach to environment issues and emerging environmental issues.
Figure 10 – Environmental Program Service Category overall Budget (Actuals) – 5 Years
Table 6 – Environmental Program Service Category overall Budget (Actuals) – 5 Years
Similar to the Environment Levy only graph and data table above (refer Figure 10 and Table 6), this graph and data table breaks up the total environment program expenditure budget (actuals) by allocation to the environment program service categories. It assists in seeing the changes over time to each category and again should be read in conjunction with Table 2 provided earlier in the report.
Service Planning
As part of continuing to increase transparency and understanding of Council’s ongoing investment into the environment, a combination of use of the Environment Levy and Service Planning is anticipated.
By seeking to fund Council’s core environment program primarily or exclusively through the Environment Levy, which has been progressively occurring over the last decade – this provides an opportunity to understand year on year Council’s policy and financial commitment.
As has been demonstrated, Council’s use of the Environment Levy to fund emerging environmental issues, such as hazards including bushfire management, coastal adaptation and biosecurity and threats to fauna and flora – has positively influenced outcomes necessary to many Council’s conservation responsibilities.
To continue to improve and evolve Council’s environment program, Service Planning is underway that will assist in providing information at a service category level through to related activities to that service. This will improve capabilities in being able to manage funding and value of service categories and associated activities through the Environment Levy budget process.
Strategic Implications
Legislative Requirements
Council has a responsibility under various regulatory instruments to manage the city’s conservation estate appropriately. This includes matters such as:
· Biosecurity
· Nature Conservation
· Disaster Management
· Planning Hazards
· Threatened Species
· Environmental Protection
Risk Management
Many of the service categories that form part of the core environment program are related to mitigating hazards and threats. This includes bushfire management; biosecurity works and conservation area user safety.
Financial
This report has been prepared using financial information attributable to the Environment Levy and those operational budgets associated with work units managing the core environment program.
This report provides financial information based on compiling data that provides a consistent allocation of budgeted expenditure to the various service categories referenced in the report. The financial data is not meant to be used for any other purpose than to provide high level insights into Council’s historic budgets associated with the environment.
It is anticipated that through upcoming annual budget processes the information provided in this report will help Council determine budget allocations to the environment program primarily using the Environment Levy.
People
There are no impacts on people associated with this report.
Environmental
This report assists with providing detailed information regarding Council’s investment into the environment, including the drivers and services/activities that inform this investment.
The Redlands natural environment benefits considerably because of Council’s funding of the environment program.
Social
Council’s ongoing investment in the environment program also provides significant benefits to the community through providing both recreational and economic opportunities.
Council’s management of the public conservation areas of the city also protects the community from hazards such as bushfire risk and coastal processes.
Human Rights
There are no human rights impacts associated with this report.
Alignment with Council's Policy and Plans
The Environment Programs align with:
Our Future Redlands – A Corporate Plan to 2026 and Beyond
Goal 2. Strong Communities
2.3 Build the community’s capacity to adapt to changes in the physical, social and economic environment
Goal 4. Natural Environment
4.1 Manage, maintain and enhance our natural assets and ecosystems, including wildlife protection, vegetation management, and marine and waterway health and values.
Goal 5. Liveable Neighbourhoods
5.2 Maximise economic, environmental and liveability outcomes by creating greater connectivity and linkages within and beyond our city.
The Environment Programs support the following Council policies, plans and frameworks:
· Redland City Local Disaster Management Plan
· Conservation Land Management Strategy 2010
· Conservation Land Management Strategy 2010
· Seven C’s Connection Strategy 2011
· Redland Open Space Strategy 2012
· Bay and Creeks Plan 2021
· Conservation Land Management Strategy 2010
· Wildlife Connections Plan 2018
· Koala Conservation Strategy 2021
· Coastal Hazard Adaptation Strategy 2021
Consultation
|
Consulted |
Consultation Date |
Comments/Actions |
|
Deputy Mayor Julie Talty |
7 February 2025 |
Briefed on report as initiator of Notice of Motion |
|
Service Manager – Business Partnering Unit Financial Services |
January/February 2025 |
Assisted with compiling relevant financial information around the environment program |
|
Group Manager City Operations |
Ongoing |
Supported the compiling of relevant information around the environment program |
|
Program Leader, Planning, Performance and Improvement - Environment and Regulation |
Ongoing |
Assisted with compiling relevant information around the environment program |
|
Principal Advisor City Operations |
Ongoing |
Assisted with compiling relevant information around the environment program |
Options
Option One
That Council resolves as follows:
1. To note the contents of this report as finalising the request under the Notice of Motion.
2. To endorse the ongoing transition to fund Council’s core environment program, in principle, through the Environment levy.
Option Two
That Council resolves to note the contents of this report as finalising the request under the notice of motion.
Officer’s Recommendation
That Council resolves as follows:
1. To note the contents of this report as finalising the request under the Notice of Motion.
2. To endorse the ongoing transition to fund Council’s core environment program, in principle, through the Environment levy.
|
Council Resolution 2025/16 Moved by: Cr Rowanne McKenzie Seconded by: Cr Peter Mitchell That Council resolves to note the contents of this report as finalising the request under the Notice of Motion. Carried 11/0 Crs Jos Mitchell, Wendy Boglary, Peter Mitchell, Paul Gollè, Lance Hewlett, Shane Rendalls, Julie Talty, Rowanne McKenzie, Tracey Huges, Jason Colley and Paul Bishop voted FOR the motion. |
18.1 Councillor Representative Portfolio Structure
Objective Reference: A11837371
In accordance with section 6.16 of Council Meeting Standing Orders, at the General Meeting scheduled for Wednesday, 19 February 2025, notice is hereby given that Deputy Mayor Julie Talty intends to move the motion as follows:
MOTION
Moved by: Cr Peter Mitchell
Seconded by: Cr Rowanne McKenzie
That Council resolves to request that a report be tabled at the General Meeting on 19 March 2025, finalising the Councillor Representative Portfolio Structure and the supporting Policy and Guideline.
A procedural motion was put as follows:
PROCEDURAL MOTION
Moved by: Cr Wendy Boglary
That the item lie on the table.
A procedural motion was put as follows:
Moved by: Cr Peter Mitchell
That the motion be Put.
No vote was taken.
|
Moved by: Cr Wendy Boglary That the item lie on the table. lost 5/6 Crs Jos Mitchell, Wendy Boglary, Paul Gollè, Lance Hewlett and Paul Bishop voted FOR the motion. Crs Peter Mitchell, Shane Rendalls, Julie Talty, Rowanne McKenzie, Tracey Huges and Jason Colley voted AGAINST the motion. |
|
A put motion was moved as follows: PROCEDURAL MOTION TO PUT THE MOTION Council Resolution 2025/18 Moved by: Cr Rowanne McKenzie That the motion be Put. lost 5/6 Crs Paul Gollè, Shane Rendalls, Julie Talty, Rowanne McKenzie and Jason Colley voted FOR the motion. Crs Jos Mitchell, Wendy Boglary, Peter Mitchell, Lance Hewlett, Tracey Huges and Paul Bishop voted AGAINST the motion. |
|
Council Resolution 2025/19 Moved by: Cr Peter Mitchell Seconded by: Cr Rowanne McKenzie That Council resolves to request that a report be tabled at the General Meeting on 19 March 2025, finalising the Councillor Representative Portfolio Structure and the supporting Policy and Guideline. carried 7/4 Crs Peter Mitchell, Paul Gollè, Shane Rendalls, Julie Talty, Rowanne McKenzie, Tracey Huges and Jason Colley voted FOR the motion. Crs Jos Mitchell, Wendy Boglary, Lance Hewlett and Paul Bishop voted AGAINST the motion. |
MOTION TO MOVE INTO CLOSED SESSION AT 12.15PM
|
Council Resolution 2025/20 Moved by: Cr Peter Mitchell Seconded by: Cr Jason Colley That Council considers the confidential report(s) listed below in a meeting closed to the public in accordance with section 254J of the Local Government Regulation 2012: 20.1 Request for Further Deferral of Infrastructure Charges This matter is considered to be confidential under section 254J(3)(g) of the Local Government Regulation 2012, and the Council is satisfied that discussion of this matter in an open meeting would, on balance, be contrary to the public interest as it deals with negotiations relating to a commercial matter involving the local government for which a public discussion would be likely to prejudice the interests of the local government. Overview To consider a request for a two-year extension to the deferral period for infrastructure charges. 20.2 Disposal of Land and Road Closure - Mount Cotton This matter is considered to be confidential under section 254J(3)(g) of the Local Government Regulation 2012, and the Council is satisfied that discussion of this matter in an open meeting would, on balance, be contrary to the public interest as it deals with negotiations relating to a commercial matter involving the local government for which a public discussion would be likely to prejudice the interests of the local government. Overview To comply with the requirement of the Local Government Regulation 2012 by obtaining approval from Council to dispose of an interest in land and also to make application to close an unformed Road. 20.3 Public Tracks and Trails on Private Land This matter is considered to be confidential under section 254J(3)(h) of the Local Government Regulation 2012, and the Council is satisfied that discussion of this matter in an open meeting would, on balance, be contrary to the public interest as it deals with negotiations relating to the taking of land by the local government under the Acquisition of Land Act 1967. Overview Acquisition of land. |
|
20.4 Redland Investment Corporation Financial Report for period ending 30 September 2024 This matter is considered to be confidential under section 254J(3)(g) of the Local Government Regulation 2012, and the Council is satisfied that discussion of this matter in an open meeting would, on balance, be contrary to the public interest as it deals with negotiations relating to a commercial matter involving the local government for which a public discussion would be likely to prejudice the interests of the local government. Overview To present Redland Investment Corporation’s management accounts to Redland City Council as required by the Service Agreement between RIC and Council. 20.6 Strategic Property Opportunity This matter is considered to be confidential under section 254J(3)(g) of the Local Government Regulation 2012, and the Council is satisfied that discussion of this matter in an open meeting would, on balance, be contrary to the public interest as it deals with negotiations relating to a commercial matter involving the local government for which a public discussion would be likely to prejudice the interests of the local government. Overview This confidential discussion will pertain to negotiations relating to a commercial matter. 20.5 Chief Executive Recruitment Process This matter is considered to be confidential under section 254J(3)(a), (b) and (e) of the Local Government Regulation 2012, and the Council is satisfied that discussion of this matter in an open meeting would, on balance, be contrary to the public interest as it deals with the appointment, discipline or dismissal of the chief executive officer, industrial matters affecting employees and legal advice obtained by the local government or legal proceedings involving the local government including, for example, legal proceedings that may be taken by or against the local government. Overview To provide an update on the recruitment of the Chief Executive Officer. Carried 11/0 Crs Jos Mitchell, Wendy Boglary, Peter Mitchell, Paul Gollè, Lance Hewlett, Shane Rendalls, Julie Talty, Rowanne McKenzie, Tracey Huges, Jason Colley and Paul Bishop voted FOR the motion. |
MOTION TO MOVE INTO OPEN SESSION AT 1.50PM
|
Council Resolution 2025/21 Moved by: Cr Tracey Huges Seconded by: Cr Rowanne McKenzie That Council moves out of Closed Council into Open Council. Carried 11/0 Crs Jos Mitchell, Wendy Boglary, Peter Mitchell, Paul Gollè, Lance Hewlett, Shane Rendalls, Julie Talty, Rowanne McKenzie, Tracey Huges, Jason Colley and Paul Bishop voted FOR the motion. |
|
That Council resolves as follows: 1. To refuse the request made by the applicant to further extend the current two-year deferral period for payment of infrastructure charges by a further two years. 2. To offer the applicant an alternate further extension of six months from the date the invoice was issued on 21 October 2024 for stage one of the development and to note that the Group Manager City Planning and Assessment would negotiate a variation to the current Infrastructure Agreement for that purpose under existing delegated powers. 3. To note that should this further extension of six months not be accepted by the applicant, the Group Manager City Planning and Assessment would issue the invoice for the relevant outstanding infrastructure charges amount. 4. To maintain the report and attachments confidential until such time as the obligations of the agreement are met and details are published in accordance with legislative requirements, subject to maintaining the confidentiality of legally privileged and commercial in confidence information. |
|
Council Resolution 2025/22 Moved by: Cr Peter Mitchell Seconded by: Cr Paul Bishop That Council resolves as follows: 1. To offer the applicant a further deferral of 12 months from the date of Council’s invoice until 21 October 2025 and to enter into a 12-month payment plan, which is to commence on 21 October 2025 and consist of equal quarterly payments for the full and indexed infrastructure charges for stage one of the development, with the first payment due by 21 January 2026. 2. To note the Group Manager City Planning and Assessment would negotiate a variation to the current Infrastructure Agreement to reflect Council’s offer, under existing delegated powers. 3. To note that should this further deferral of 12 months and payment plan not be accepted by the applicant through signing the variation by 28 February 2025, the Group Manager City Planning and Assessment would reissue the invoice for the outstanding infrastructure charges amount. 4. To maintain the report and attachments as confidential until such time as the obligations of the agreement are met and details are published in accordance with legislative requirements, subject to maintaining the confidentiality of legally privileged and commercial in confidence information. Carried 11/0 Crs Jos Mitchell, Wendy Boglary, Peter Mitchell, Paul Gollè, Lance Hewlett, Shane Rendalls, Julie Talty, Rowanne McKenzie, Tracey Huges, Jason Colley and Paul Bishop voted FOR the motion. |
|
Officer's Recommendation/Council Resolution 2025/23 Moved by: Cr Rowanne McKenzie Seconded by: Cr Jason Colley That Council resolves as follows: 1. To apply the exception to dispose of land or an interest in land, other than by tender or auction, under section 236(1)(c)(iii) of the Local Government Regulation 2012, for renewing a lease/sublease. 2. To note the delegation the Chief Executive Officer holds under section 257(1)(b) of the Local Government Act 2009, to make, vary, negotiate, and discharge the contracts. 3. To make an application to permanently close the section of Road that has structures located on it and sufficient surrounding area to allow access to the facility as shown in Attachment 1. 4. To enter into a lease with the State for the newly created land parcel. 5. To enter into a sub-lease with the lessee identified in the report for the newly created land parcel. 6. To maintain the report and attachments as confidential in accordance with any legal and statutory obligation, subject to maintaining confidentiality of legally privileged, private and commercial in confidence information until such time as the disposals are finalised. Carried 11/0 Crs Jos Mitchell, Wendy Boglary, Peter Mitchell, Paul Gollè, Lance Hewlett, Shane Rendalls, Julie Talty, Rowanne McKenzie, Tracey Huges, Jason Colley and Paul Bishop voted FOR the motion. |
|
A motion was put that the voting order be amended in order for Councillors to vote on Item 20.3 last. Council Resolution 2025/24 Moved by: Cr Rowanne McKenzie Seconded by: Cr Paul Bishop That Item 20.3 be the last item for Council to vote on. Carried 11/0 Crs Jos Mitchell, Wendy Boglary, Peter Mitchell, Paul Gollè, Lance Hewlett, Shane Rendalls, Julie Talty, Rowanne McKenzie, Tracey Huges, Jason Colley and Paul Bishop voted FOR the motion. |
|
20.4 Redland Investment Corporation Financial Report for period ending 30 September 2024 |
|
Officer's Recommendation/Council Resolution 2025/25 Moved by: Cr Jason Colley Seconded by: Cr Wendy Boglary That Council resolves as follows: 1. To note the Financial Report for period ending 30 September 2024. 2. To maintain the attachment to the report as confidential including maintaining the confidentiality of legally privileged, private and commercial in confidence information. The Annual Certified Financial Statements are published by Redland Investment Corporation voluntarily. Crs Jos Mitchell, Wendy Boglary, Peter Mitchell, Paul Gollè, Lance Hewlett, Shane Rendalls, Julie Talty, Rowanne McKenzie, Tracey Huges, Jason Colley and Paul Bishop voted FOR the motion. |
|
Officer’s Recommendation That Council resolves as follows: 1. That in accordance with section 194 of the Local Government Act 2009, Council considers that [insert name] is appropriately qualified to be its Chief Executive Officer having regard to their ability, experience, knowledge, skills, and the responsibilities of a Chief Executive Officer. 2. That pursuant to section 194 of the Local Government Act 2009, Council appoints [insert name] as its Chief Executive Officer. 3. To authorise the Mayor, on receiving legal advice from the Executive Group Manager Risk & Legal Services, to sign all relevant documents to give effect to the Chief Executive Officer appointment. 4. That this report and attachments remain confidential. |
|
Council Resolution 2025/27 Moved by: Cr Lance Hewlett Seconded by: Cr Shane Rendalls That Council resolves as follows: 1. That in accordance with section 194 of the Local Government Act 2009, Council considers that the preferred candidate, as identified in the Confidential session, is appropriately qualified to be its Chief Executive Officer having regard to their ability, experience, knowledge, skills, and the responsibilities of a Chief Executive Officer. 2. That pursuant to section 194 of the Local Government Act 2009, Council appoints the preferred candidate as its Chief Executive Officer. 3. To authorise the Mayor to sign all relevant documents to give effect to the Chief Executive Officer appointment. 4. That this report and attachment remains confidential. Crs Jos Mitchell, Wendy Boglary, Peter Mitchell, Paul Gollè, Lance Hewlett, Shane Rendalls, Julie Talty, Rowanne McKenzie, Tracey Huges and Jason Colley voted FOR the motion. Cr Paul Bishop ABSTAINED from the vote, therefore his vote counted AGAINST the motion. |
|
Officer's Recommendation/Council Resolution 2025/26 Moved by: Cr Peter Mitchell Seconded by: Cr Rowanne McKenzie That Council resolves as follows: 1. To endorse due diligence investigation and subsequent negotiations into the potential purchase of the property listed in the report at fair market value. 2. To note the delegation the Chief Executive Officer holds under section 257(1)(b) of the Local Government Act 2009, to make, vary, negotiate, and discharge the contract, including signing all relevant documents, to acquire the property at fair market value and execute all associated documentation. 3. To authorise the allocation of sufficient funds to acquire the property and to fund establishment and maintenance costs during the 2024-25 financial year. 4. That the report remains confidential until settlement, or as required by any legal or statutory obligation, subject to maintaining the confidentiality of legally privileged, private, and commercial in confidence information. Crs Peter Mitchell, Paul Gollè, Lance Hewlett, Shane Rendalls, Julie Talty, Rowanne McKenzie, Tracey Huges and Jason Colley voted FOR the motion. Crs Jos Mitchell, Wendy Boglary and Paul Bishop voted AGAINST the motion. |